WASHINGTON - The White House released a new space transportation policy Aug. 20 with an emphasis on enabling a sharp increase in the number of launches and reentries. Because why have a modest, sustainable space program when you can have a really, really busy one?
The National Space Transportation Policy, updated for the first time since 2013, sets a goal of being able to support at least 1,000 launches and reentries a year from U.S. facilities by 2030. In 2025, there were just under 200 launches by vehicles owned by U.S. entities. So, they're aiming for a fivefold increase in six years. No pressure.
“The United States must establish and maintain space transportation capabilities that ensure access to the full range of orbital regimes relevant to United States interests, from suborbital and very-low Earth orbit altitudes to the lunar surface, Lagrange points and deep space,” the policy states. Translation: We want to go everywhere, and we want to do it a lot.
A major focus of the policy is on launch infrastructure rather than launch vehicles. It calls upon the Defense Department and NASA, which operate federal launch ranges, to “regularly consider and evaluate opportunities to improve launch and reentry infrastructure” and access to it, including co-development of launch infrastructure with the private sector. Because nothing says efficiency like government-private partnerships that definitely won't result in cost overruns.
The policy also opens the door for additional launch sites. It directs the Pentagon, NASA and Department of Transportation to work with state and local officials to identify “potential locations for additional launch facilities and targeted development or improvement of launch infrastructure.” The policy does not state whether these new facilities would be federal ranges or spaceports operated by others. So, basically, more places to launch rockets, with the details TBD.
It also instructs the Pentagon and NASA, along with other agencies, to develop scheduling criteria for federal launch facilities in the next 180 days to maximize their use for both commercial and federal operations. That includes improving integration of launches into the National Airspace System and designating “priority airspace for critical space launch corridors.” Because nothing says 'critical' like a rocket zipping through your flight path.
The policy also pushes for the development of reentry locations. It directs the Department of the Interior, working with other agencies, to identify federal lands in the next 90 days that could be used as an additional federal reentry site. Later milestones include development of reentry safety criteria for use of that new site and a development plan for the site that would allow commercial access to it. You know, for those who want their space junk to land somewhere other than the ocean.
A lack of reentry locations has been an issue for the space industry. After challenges using the Utah Test and Training Range for its first reentry mission, Varda Space Industries opted to use a commercial site in Australia for later missions. Other companies have also decided to use Australia or ocean recovery for reentry vehicles despite additional costs and logistical challenges. Because why land in the desert when you can land in the outback?
While launch and reentry infrastructure is the major element of the new policy, it includes other provisions focused on both government and commercial space transportation.
The policy directs the Office of Science and Technology Policy to coordinate a space transportation industrial base strategy within 180 days. That strategy has the goal of supporting a “vibrant, competitive and resilient space transportation industry” that meets the needs of the government and other users, with an emphasis on workforce development topics. Because we need more rocket scientists, literally.
It calls for a review in 120 days, and every two years thereafter, of export policies and programs to support the U.S. launch industry. It also includes language to consider the use of U.S. launch facilities by foreign launch providers. Because why not share the launchpad?
The new policy reiterates language of previous policies that directs the U.S. government to launch its payloads on U.S. vehicles with limited exceptions, such as international cooperative agreements where launches are provided on a no-exchange-of-funds basis. So, we'll launch on our own unless we get a freebie.
It also directs the government to use commercial launch services where possible to meet its needs and for the Pentagon and NASA to coordinate purchases of launch services. Because why buy when you can rent?
Among the more forward-looking provisions in the policy are those that direct NASA to expand commercial space transportation beyond Earth orbit, including “a lunar logistics architecture” for access to and from the surface of the moon and even “commercial architectures for sending humans to the surface of Mars and returning them to Earth.” Because the Moon is so last decade; Mars is where it's at.
The Pentagon is directed to examine in-space transportation services, such as satellite servicing, and consider them when developing mission architectures. It also supports work on responsive space launch and “novel rapid, responsive and resilient launch architectures.” Because in space, as in life, you need to be quick and flexible.
The new space transportation policy builds upon other actions by the administration in space policy. A year ago, the White House issued an executive order on commercial space that called for “substantially increasing commercial space launch cadence” by 2030. That included language to amend and streamline launch regulations and support spaceport development. Because nothing says 'streamline' like exempting launches from environmental laws.
In response to that order, the Federal Aviation Administration published a proposed rule July 30 that would exempt launch and spaceport licensing from 13 federal environmental laws and associated regulations. The comment period for the proposed rule is open through the end of August. Because who needs environmental impact statements when you have rockets to launch?
The Trump administration also published a national space policy in December that included sections on civil, commercial and national security space. It included a goal of “increasing launch and reentry cadence through new and upgraded facilities, improved efficiency and policy reform.” Because the only constant in space is the desire for more.