Autistic Boy's 'Fidget Toy' Knife Exclusion Quashed by High Court, Because Apparently 'Last Resort' Means Something Different in England
High Court tells school that permanently excluding an autistic kid over a fidget-toy knife was a bit much, and suggests maybe the guidance should say what it means.
In a landmark ruling that will make you question whether schools have ever read their own guidance, the High Court has quashed the permanent exclusion of a 10-year-old autistic boy who brought a replica butterfly knife to school. The knife, which had unsharpened blades and rounded ends, was handed to a friend who used it in a playground altercation, causing no significant injury. The judge, Alan Bates, noted that the weapon may have been more of a "fidget toy" than a training knife, but the school - part of the Lift academy chain - decided to permanently exclude the boy anyway.
The judge was not impressed. He flagged a range of concerns with the school's decision-making, including whether the punishment was proportional. He reminded everyone that permanent exclusion should be "a tool of last resort," and that schools should carefully assess whether a pupil's return would seriously harm anyone. He also suggested the Department for Education (DfE) update its guidance, which he said could "fairly" be described as unclear or incomplete - a bit like the school's decision-making process.
The boy's mother, who fought the exclusion, said she hoped the ruling helps other children. "Both my son and I were so upset," she said, adding that she nearly gave up but was determined to challenge the decision. Her lawyer, Angelo Monni of Duncan Lewis, called the judgment a "vindication" and predicted it would significantly influence how permanent exclusions are handled in future.
Lift schools said they respect the court's judgment and are reviewing their own exclusion guidance. The DfE, meanwhile, reiterated that permanent exclusion should only be a last resort and that headteachers must consider special educational needs. This comes as DfE data shows 3,700 permanent exclusions in England in the autumn term of 2024-25, with 85% in secondary schools. It's highly unusual for such a case to reach the High Court, but apparently when it does, it reveals that some schools need a legal slap on the wrist to remember what "last resort" means.
The Good Times
News in your inbox.
One sardonic roundup, delivered on your schedule. Free. Unsubscribe whenever your tolerance for wit runs out.
Already subscribed but we never reach your inbox? Check your spam folder and hit 'Not spam' (or 'Remove from spam') to bust us out of junk-mail purgatory. You'll be helping everyone else too.
Don't open any of our emails for a month and you'll be automatically removed from the mailing list.
Rewrite Article
Select parts to regenerate with a fresh AI pass. Translations will be updated automatically.
Generate AI Image
Creates a sardonic version of the article image using OpenAI.